|
Abstract
The
purpose of the current study was to examine the predictions of the "hunter-gatherer"
(Silverman & Eals, 1992) and gender-schema (Martin & Halverson,
1981) theories with respect to gender-linked differences in spatial and
object memory of children and adults. A total of 160 five- to thirteen-year-old
children and adults participated. Each participant was randomly assigned
to either the incidental (INC) or the intentional (INT) memory condition.
In this repeated-measures design, each participant viewed a total of 36
sex-stereotyped static and dynamic toy pictures and was asked
to recall the previously seen toys after a filler task. In general, the
results did not support the evolutionary hypothesis, but they did, in part,
confirm gender schema theory. Congruent with the gender-schema theory, there
was no overall memory advantage for males or females across the two conditions.
On average, males and females remembered an equal number of objects. Overall,
the participants recalled more static toy pictures than dynamic pictures.
Also, with age, the participants recalled more stimuli. This pattern was
significant also across memory conditions. As predicted, males and females
recalled more objects in the INT than in the INC memory condition. Consistent
with gender-schema theory, the results revealed a weak interaction between
sex of the participant and the sex-stereotyped toys. In the INC condition,
males remembered more male stereotyped toys than female and neutral stereotyped
toys, and females recalled more female and male stereotyped objects than
neutral stereotyped objects. The pattern of recall was different in the
INT condition, suggesting that the mechanisms of these two types of memory
are somewhat distinct. According to the present findings, there is no emergence
of cognitive sex differences in a task using either incidental or intentional
memory that assesses static or dynamic sex-stereotyped stimuli.
|